ArticleScientific reports2025
Preliminary findings from a retrospective comparative study on a novel hydrophobic C-loop monofocal intraocular lens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of a Monofocal, Optimized, Aspheric IOL in Eyes with Different Degrees of Corneal Spherical Aberration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Trial
- Article
- Short-Term Visual and Optical Performance of the ZEISS CT LUCIA 621P Intraocular Lens Across Different Power Ranges.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate visual outcomes and optical performance of a new non-constant aberration aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). This study included consecutive patients who underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of either the CT LUCIA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.