ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid parallel convolutional spiking neural network for enhanced skin cancer detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auto Deep Spiking Neural Network Design Based on an Evolutionary Membrane Algorithm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- NeuroMorphFusion: A Neuro-Inspired Hybrid Learning Framework for Interpretable Deep Lesion Detection in IoT-Enabled Healthcare Systems.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most widespread kind of cancer, affecting millions of lives is skin cancer. When the condition of illness worsens, the chance of survival is reduced, and thus detection of skin cancer is extremely difficult. Hence, this paper introduces a new model, known as Parallel Convolutional Spiking Neural Network (PCSN-Net) for detecting skin cancer. Initially, the input skin cancer image is pre-processed by employing Medav filter to eradicate the noise in image. Next, affected region is segmented by utilizing DeepSegNet, which is formed by integrating SegNet and Deep joint segmentation, where RV coefficient is used to fuse the outputs. Here, the segmented image is then augmented by including process, such as geometric transformation, colorspace transformation, mixing images Pixel averaging (mixup), and overlaying crops (CutMix). Then textural, statistical, Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) based Local Direction Pattern (LDP) with entropy, and Local Normal Derivative Pattern (LNDP) features are mined. Finally, skin cancer detection is executed using PCSN-Net, which is formed by fusing Parallel Convolutional Neural Network (PCNN) and Deep Spiking Neural Network (DSNN). In this work, the suggested PCSN-Net system shows high accuracy and reliability in identifying skin cancer. The experimental findings suggest that PCSN-Net has an accuracy of 95.7%, a sensitivity of 94.7%, and a specificity of 92.6%. These parameters demonstrate the model's capacity to discriminate among malignant and benign skin lesions properly. Furthermore, the system has a false positive rate (FPR) of 10.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.8%, demonstrating its capacity to reduce wrong diagnosis while prioritizing true positive instances. PCSN-Net outperforms various complex algorithms, including EfficientNet, DenseNet, and Inception-ResNet-V2, despite preserving effective training and inference times. The results obtained show the feasibility of the model for real-time clinical use, strengthening its capacity for quick and accurate skin cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.