Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169554›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2025

What's on the menu? A qualitative study on the views of care home staff and residents on nutritional practices and implications for oral health.

Aditi Mondkar, Maritess Murdoch, Jennifer E Gallagher, Rakhee Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aditi MondkarConsultant in Dental Public Health, NHS England South East, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG, UK. Aditi.Mondkar@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9415-6893
Maritess MurdochService Development, Integration, Transformation and Delivery Lead (Age Well), NHS North Central London Integrated Care Board, Laycock Street, London, N1 1TH, UK.
Jennifer E GallagherNewland-Pedley Professor of Oral Health Strategy/ Honorary Consultant in Dental Public Health, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus. Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-8008
Rakhee PatelSenior Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Dental Public Health, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus. Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople living in nursing or residential homes are at an increased risk of having or developing oral and dental diseases. This is due to contributing factors such as comorbidities and polypharmacy coupled with poor manual dexterity and lack of disease prevention and access to care. These risk factors combined with frequent and high sugar consumption increases risk of developing dental decay. Care home residents are a diverse population from different backgrounds. Little is known about decision making around nutrition in care settings and nutritional practices of older people in care homes, including the choices and challenges. The purpose of this study was therefore, to understand care home landscape and resident experiences. MATERIALS AND

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with participants including residents, care home managers, carers and kitchen staff. Interviews were held face-to-face, recorded and transcribed and the findings were analysed using a thematic approach.

resultsA total of 17 participants across 4 care homes in one outer London borough took part in this study, with findings relating to both nutrition and oral health. Resident food preferences were collected upon admission into the home, including information on the incoming resident's lifestyle, routine and choices. Staff tried to maintain these where possible and accommodate to resident choices when possible. Opportunities for wider food choice was dependent on the residents' ability and willingness to request alternatives, their financial freedom to purchase their own foods, mobility to access food outside of the care home setting and food bought in by family and friends. This was compounded by residents being prescribed high calorie, high sugar meal supplemented for weight management. Participants reported that the structured routine revolved around meals and activities. Most care staff reported that an alternative healthy option was offered at mealtimes, but this was not the case in all homes. Care staff faced challenges managing weight of residents who had appetite loss and tried to accommodate and make provisions for those with these experiences and were aware of how to raise concerns. There was variation in mandatory training expectations, with no integration of oral health and nutrition. DISCUSSION: The findings provided valuable insight into the disparities between and within homes and highlights the challenges in this complex group with regards to nutritional choices. It is vital that a range of food options are in place to protect residents' rights to choose what they wish to eat, whilst offering healthy options and all care staff are educated on offering balanced, nutritious meal and snack options. By offering a range of foods, the healthier choice can be the easier choice.

Identifiers

PMID40169554
PMCPMC11962115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.