ReviewPharmaceutical medicine2025
The Importance of Including Underserved Populations in Research.
Review in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Experience of Stigma Within the Young Onset Dementia (YOD) Population: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Pooled it
- Public health policies and interventions to address health inequities in high-income countries: an umbrella review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Sensor for sports applications: monitoring and assessment of intrinsic capacity enhancement in older adults during brisk walking.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Geospatial Access to Pediatric Cardiac and Cardiac-Surgical Services by Neighborhood-Level Determinants of Health.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Balancing rigor and pragmatism in health research: a guide to choosing study designs for real-world settings.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Review
- Characterizing Barriers to Engaging in Digestive Health care for Sexual and Gender Minority People in the United States.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Intersection of Precision Nutrition and Bladder Cancer: A Narrative State-of-the-Art Review of Potential Applications and Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- The development and use of chatbots in enhancing health care access for underserved and vulnerable populations: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Characterizing the Research Participant Recruitment Funnel for Alzheimer's Secondary Prevention Trials: Results from A National Survey of U.S. Adults.Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging · 2025Article
- Ethics From the Outset: Incorporating Ethical Considerations into the Artificial Intelligence and Technology Collaboratories for Aging Research Pilot Projects.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Article
- Patterns of Enrollment of Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in ECOG-ACRIN Sponsored Breast Cancer Therapeutic Clinical Trials.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the ethical considerations surrounding the inclusion of underserved populations in later-phase clinical trials. Underserved populations, defined here as those with restricted access to or limited benefits from healthcare, often face systemic, logistical, and social barriers that limit their participation in research. This results in a lack of representation that undermines fairness in research and also hampers the development of effective inclusive healthcare practices. This paper argues that including underserved populations in research is crucial for promoting justice, increasing the generalizability of research findings, and building trust in medical institutions. It differentiates underserved populations from other populations of interest, including vulnerable, minority, and underrepresented groups. It then explores barriers to research participation and targeted solutions for four underserved populations: rural residents, racial and ethnic minorities, low-income individuals, and older adults. Strategies for improving participation include expanding trial sites to accessible locations, lowering financial and logistical barriers, broadening eligibility criteria, and fostering culturally tailored outreach and engagement. While some interventions may apply broadly across groups, effective solutions will often require intersectional and context-specific strategies tailored to each population's unique needs as well as coordinated efforts from multiple stakeholders. While these interventions alone cannot resolve healthcare inequities - as underrepresentation of underserved populations in research is just one contributing factor - their widespread implementation would represent meaningful steps toward advancing health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.