Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169527›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2025

Opioid Analgesics: Rise and Fall of Ligand Biased Signaling and Future Perspectives in the Quest for the Holy Grail.

Émile Breault, Rebecca L Brouillette, Terence E Hébert, Philippe Sarret, Élie Besserer-Offroy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Émile BreaultDepartment of Pharmacology-Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12è avenue nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H5N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-450X
Rebecca L BrouilletteDepartment of Pharmacology-Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12è avenue nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H5N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-9653
Terence E HébertDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7079-653X
Philippe Sarret *Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12è avenue nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H5N4, Canada. philippe.sarret@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7627-701X
Élie Besserer-Offroy *Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12è avenue nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H5N4, Canada. elie.besserer-offroy@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-7043

Funding

CIHR FDN-148413Université de Caen Normandie LPI-CANADA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid analgesics have been used for more than 5000 years and remain the main pain medications prescribed today. Although morphine is considered the gold standard of pain relief, this selective µ-opioid receptor (MOP) agonist provides only moderate relief for many chronic pain conditions and produces a number of unwanted effects that can affect the patient's quality of life, prevent adherence to treatment or lead to addiction. In addition to the lack of progress in developing better analgesics, there have been no significant breakthroughs to date in combating the above-mentioned side effects. Fortunately, a better understanding of opioid pharmacology has given renewed hope for the development of better and safer pain medications. In this review, we describe how clinically approved opioids were initially characterized as biased ligands and what impact this approach might have on clinical practice. We also look at the preclinical and clinical development of biased MOP agonists, focusing on the history of oliceridine, the first specifically designed biased analgesic. In addition, we explore the discrepancies between ligands with low intrinsic efficacy and those with biased properties. Finally, we examine the rationale behind the development of biased ligands during the opioid crisis.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainReceptors, Opioid, muAnimalsHumansLigandsSignal TransductionAnalgesics, OpioidLigandsReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.