Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169524›Full record

SynthesisCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025

Empathy and moral judgment: Systematic review and meta-analysis of ERP studies.

Youran Zhang, Zhiqiang Yan, Yiyi Wang, Yanjie Su

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Youran ZhangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, and Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100871, People's Republic of China.
Zhiqiang YanDepartment of Psychology, Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Human Province, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, China.
Yiyi WangDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 South University Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Yanjie SuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, and Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100871, People's Republic of China. yjsu@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071075National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the bidirectional relationship between empathy and moral judgment has been extensively investigated, the underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. The current study examined 19 event-related potential studies to explore the relationship between empathy and moral judgment, including 60 effect sizes. It was found that individuals with higher levels of empathy exhibited a significantly increased amplitude in the N2 component during moral judgment tasks when presented with moral versus immoral scenarios (r

Indexed as

BrainEmpathyEvoked PotentialsJudgmentMoralsElectroencephalographyHumansAutomatic attentionCognitive regulationEmpathyEvent-related potentialMeta-analysisMoral judgment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.