Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169494›Full record

SynthesisPharmacoEconomics - open2025

Economic Burden of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in European Union: Results from a Systematic Review of Literature.

Alisha Saeed, Zermina Tasleem, Sohail Ayaz Muhammad, Anees Ur Rehman, Shahid Shah, Qurratul Ain Jamil, Hajra Siddiqui, Hidayah Karuniawati, Saleh Karamah Al-Tamimi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alisha SaeedDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Zermina TasleemDepartment of Political Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Sohail Ayaz MuhammadSchool of Management Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Anees Ur RehmanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. aneesurrehman@bzu.edu.pk.
Shahid ShahDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Qurratul Ain JamilDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Hajra SiddiquiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Hidayah KaruniawatiDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia.
Saleh Karamah Al-TamimiFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Aden, Aden, Yemen. salehk810@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3420-4752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous malignancy whose management is associated with considerable healthcare resource utilization and high expenditures because of recurrent and extended hospitalizations, multiple outpatient visits, and a wide range of supportive care. Modern therapies with improved safety profiles may assist in reducing healthcare costs; however, they are usually more expensive than standard chemotherapies. Few studies have addressed the expenses and burden of AML. Most of these studies were conducted in the USA. Very little research is available from the European Union (EU).

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the economic impact of AML and determine the major cost-driving factors for its treatment in the EU.

methodsThis systematic review is in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies on the economic impact of AML in various countries of the EU, published before April 15, 2024. Original studies investigating direct costs including expenses for treatment and healthcare services, or resource utilization for AML management were included. The systematic review excluded commentaries, editorials, and pharmacoeconomic modeling studies. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment, and the third reviewer resolved disagreements. We employed the Allison Larg Cost-of-Illness Studies evaluation checklist to assess the risk of bias. The mean cost per patient for induction, consolidation, and transplantation was calculated, and the results were converted into 2024 Euros.

resultsTwenty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria, with the sample size of AML patients ranging from 12 to 39,568. The calculated per-patient direct costs of induction chemotherapy in Spain, France, Netherlands, Germany, and Italy were €92,378, €77,844, €61,643, €46,113, and €20,254, respectively. The mean per-patient direct cost of consolidation chemotherapy in the Netherlands and Germany was €42,137, and €32,220, respectively. The mean per-patient direct costs of transplantation in Sweden, Austria, France, Netherlands, and Spain were €192,628, €188,453, €132,352, €122,760, and €47,968, respectively. The cost-driving factors associated with AML treatment were inpatient hospitalization and medication costs.

conclusionAML seems to incur substantial direct economic expenses. Reducing the days of hospitalization can significantly decrease the economic burden of AML in the European Union. Moreover, there is a necessity for studies that comprehensively evaluate the economic implications, particularly concerning total and indirect costs. REGISTRATION: Registered in PROSPERO under the registration number 'CRD42024537725'.

Identifiers

PMID40169494
PMCPMC12037953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.