Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169468›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

Capturing the Perspectives of "Laypeople" on Policy Effectiveness: Employers' and Precariously Employed Workers' Suggested Improvements for the Workers' Compensation System and Work Injury Processes.

Nicole Billias, Ellen MacEachen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole BilliasSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Ellen MacEachenSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. ellen.maceachen@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-7650

Funding

CIHR 159064Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research 895-2018-4009 and 159064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrecarious employment rates are rising, which challenges the effectiveness of current workers' compensation systems. Precariously employed workers encounter problems related to short-term and/or temporary employment, and complicated employment relationships. Few voices are captured in the literature from precariously employed workers and employers of these workers regarding day-to-day experience of workers' compensation policies. This article describes employers' and precariously employed workers' suggested changes and improvements to a workers' compensation system and other processes related to work injury and return-to-work.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted in Ontario, Canada with 36 precariously employed workers and 15 employers of precariously employed workers who were recruited via social media, email lists, cold calling, word-of-mouth, and the "snowball" method. Thematic code summaries were analyzed to identify suggested workers' compensation system improvements that relate to precarious employment.

resultsEmployers' and precariously employed workers' suggestions fell into the categories of (1) communication, (2) worker health and healthcare, and (3) worker and employer support.

conclusionIdentifying precariously employed workers and employers of precariously employed workers' suggestions enables a better understanding of areas of improvement for workers' compensation policy and how these policy changes could affect these interested parties with regards to managing workplace rehabilitation and disability.

Indexed as

EmploymentOccupational InjuriesWorkers' CompensationAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOntarioQualitative ResearchReturn to WorkLay knowledgeOccupational injuryOntarioPrecarious employmentReturn to workWorkers’ compensation policy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.