Trial reportDysphagia2025
Effect of Visual Biofeedback Using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument and Auditory Feedback on Floor-of-the-Mouth Muscle Activation and Oral Pressure During Effortful Swallowing in Healthy Older Adults.
Trial report in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Effortful swallowing (ES) is a promising exercise option for patients with dysphagia due to reduced tongue base retraction. However, studies confirming how exercise physiology changes when performing ES continuously over multiple sets in clinical practice are limited. This study aimed to determine the effect of visual biofeedback using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) on the muscle activity of the floor-of-the-mouth (FOM) and oral swallowing pressure during ES exercise. Forty-five healthy older adults (mean age 76.1 ± 4.48y) participated in this randomized crossover study with two conditions. In the visual biofeedback condition using the IOPI, the participants were presented with a value corresponding to 80% of the maximum isometric pressure of the posterior oral tongue measured at baseline and asked to exceed the target value while performing ES. In the no-feedback condition, the IOPI screen was blocked to ensure that information regarding the swallowing pressure during ES was not provided. In the biofeedback condition, participants showed a significantly higher oral swallowing pressure from Sets 3-8 compared with the no-feedback condition (p < 0.05). In the no feedback condition, FOM muscle activity was significantly lower in Set 4 than in the Set 1 (p < 0.05). To improve the strength of the tongue and FOM muscles through ES exercise, providing biofeedback using the IOPI may be beneficial for maintaining a consistently high level of exercise intensity. Further research is required to enable the application of this study's finding to patients with dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40169446What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.