SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2025
Role of artificial intelligence in predicting the renal function after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore and assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the postoperative renal function in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing nephrectomy.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies that used AI models to predict renal function after nephrectomy were included in our review. The details of different AI models, the input variables used to train and validate them, and the output generated from these models were recorded and analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).
resultsAfter the screening, a total of nine studies were included for the final analysis. The most common AI algorithms that were used to predict were based on machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and XGBoost. Different performance metrics of various AI models were analysed. The pooled AUROC (area under the receiver operating curve) of the AI models was 0.79 (0.75-0.84), I
conclusionAI models exhibit significant potential for determining postoperative renal function in RCC patients. They integrate multimodal data to generate more accurate results. However, standardising the methodologies and reporting, utilising diverse datasets, and improving model interpretability can lead to widespread clinical adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40169443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.