ReviewJournal of anesthesia2025
Anesthesia management for cardiac catheter ablation: what anesthesiologists should know.
Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuromuscular blockade during pulsed field ablation: interpreting peripheral neuromuscular monitoring and PFA-synchronous respiratory waveforms.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Reply to the comment on the "High-frequency low-tidal-volume ventilation reduces loop catheter displacement during pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation".Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- High-frequency low-tidal-volume ventilation reduces loop catheter displacement during pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- High-frequency low-tidal-volume ventilation during catheter ablation: importance of monitoring electroanatomical mapping system.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation has become a central part of the non-pharmacological treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. It can be performed under conscious sedation, deep sedation, or general anesthesia, but it is getting clear that the incidence of complications during the procedure and the success rate of treatment (with no recurrence of arrhythmia) may be strongly influenced by sedation or anesthesia method. In particular, in sedated patients, ablation procedure may frequently cause severe pain, and the most common adverse events are related to sedation methods. Therefore, anesthesiologists will increasingly be asked to take care of the patients undergoing catheter ablation. In this article, we describe what anesthesiologists should know about ablation procedure and its associated problems, to provide appropriate anesthesia care to patients undergoing catheter ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40169436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.