ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Effects of quality assurance in arthroplasty : An evaluation of the development of the semi-annual hospital evaluations of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD)].
Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [EndoCert and EPRD-two pillars of quality assurance in arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality assurance in arthroplasty is based on established systems such as the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) and the EndoCert certification system. These systems enable continuous improvement in the quality of care through targeted feedback and audits. After the introduction of the semi-annual EPRD hospital evaluations, detailed analyses and comparisons of their revision rates for hip and knee arthroplasties (THA, TKA) became possible for the hospitals. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the standardised revision ratios (SRR) of the EPRD clinics. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study analysed whether poor results in previous evaluations led to an improvement over time. The analysis was based on hospital evaluations from June 2020 and December 2023 for elective THA with cementless stems and standard TKA. Of the 603 clinics with THA responses, 315 were analysed, compared to 360 of the 588 TKA clinics.
resultsThe results show that regular feedback mechanisms can improve the quality of care; 69.2% of clinics were able to maintain or improve the quality of their THA care and 70.6% of clinics were able to maintain or improve their TKA care. No dependence on case volumes was found, which indicates that all EPRD clinics can benefit equally from the feedback. DISCUSSION: The hospital evaluations enable precise tracking of results, promote transparency and reveal potential for improvement. In view of new legislation such as the Implant Register Act and the hospital reform, it is essential to further strengthen existing systems such as the EPRD and EndoCert and integrate them even more closely into clinical practice in order to ensure the quality of care in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.