ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Single-Center Experience with Venus-P Self-expanding Pulmonary Valve: Insights on Valve Sizing and Procedural Techniques.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- One Anatomy, Multiple Valve Choices: Interobserver Agreement in Selecting Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Venus P-valve for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction.Future cardiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We share a single-center experience of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) with the Venus-P valve, discussing procedural insights, considerations for valve sizing in relation to valve expansion and geometry, and associated outcomes. Retrospective review of 42 consecutive cases from January 2017 to March 2024. The median age and weight of the cohort were 39.6 (27.3, 58.6) years and 69.8 (59.8, 85.3) kg and the Venus-P valve was successfully implanted in 98%. Severe adverse events included valve migration requiring surgical explant and PVR (n = 1), sustained ventricular arrhythmia (n = 1), and endocarditis (n = 1). At mean follow-up of 20.3 ± 19.6 months, there was no deterioration in valve performance and statistically significant improvement in NYHA class, right ventricular volumes, biventricular stroke volume, and LV ejection fraction. Cinefluoroscopic measurements of the deployed valves showed highest expansion and lowest eccentricity at valve coaptation level and greater frame deformation at the inflow compared to outflow flare. Supra-annular (n = 9) implant showed a higher expansion of the straight valve section compared to transannular (n = 32) deployment, related to lesser degree of valve oversizing and tissue characteristics at implant site. Transcatheter PVR with the Venus-P valve can be safely performed in a broad range of anatomies with clinical benefit at medium-term follow-up. Valve sizing focused on adequate deformation of inflow and outflow flares at implant location with minimal constrain at the valve portion and supra-annular positioning, may result in a higher degree of valve expansion and circularity. Ongoing follow-up of this cohort will provide important insights into valve longevity and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.