ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and How it Correlates to Intracardiac Hemodynamics in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a noninvasive tool that can estimate volume status using fluid compartment ratios. Previous studies have demonstrated that BIA can be used to help manage heart failure using the edema index (EI), which is the ratio of extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW). This study set out to better define the relationship between BIA fluid compartment estimations and invasive hemodynamic measurements, in the context of pediatric and congenital heart disease. 52 individuals underwent 59 elective catheterizations and BIA. Data from the BIAs were compared with the hemodynamic catheterization data. The median age at the time of catheterization was 16.6 [13.5, 19.6] years (63% < 18 years-old), and 29% were female. In multivariable analysis, EI (β = 103.5 ± 47.9, p = 0.04), body mass index (BMI) (β = 0.16 ± 0.07, p = 0.02), and current Fontan circulation (β = 3.06 ± 0.96, p = 0.002) were statistically significant predictors of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). Individuals with an EI ≥ 0.39 had a statistically significant higher PCWP compared to those with an EI < 0.39 (12 [11, 17] vs. 10 [8, 12], = 0.05), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.65, 0.87). There was no statistically significant mean difference between the pre-catheterization and either post-catheterization EI (- 0.0001 mean difference (0% change), p = 0.92), or body fat mass (BFM) (+ 0.035 mean difference (0.2% change), p = 0.81). This study suggests that BIA, and more specifically EI, can noninvasively provide valuable information about hemodynamic data. BIA provides a quick, easy, non-invasive method for assessing and managing the volume status in individuals with congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.