Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169414›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2025

[Mental health and mental healthcare as elements of pandemic and crisis preparedness].

Hauke Felix Wiegand, Kristina Adorjan, Jutta Stoffers-Winterling, Simone Scheithauer, Jochen Schmitt, Oliver Tüscher, Peter Falkai, Klaus Lieb

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hauke Felix WiegandUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsmedizin Halle, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Julius-Kühn-Straße 7, 06112, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. Hauke.wiegand@uk-halle.de.
Kristina AdorjanKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz.
Jutta Stoffers-WinterlingKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Simone ScheithauerInstitut für Hygiene und Infektiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Jochen SchmittZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Oliver TüscherUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsmedizin Halle, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Julius-Kühn-Straße 7, 06112, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Peter FalkaiKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Klaus LiebKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was challenging in terms of the mental health of the population and the provision of mental health services. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To gain insights from the pandemic for an improved pandemic and crisis preparedness for the future. MATERIAL AND

methodsRecommendations are derived from the results of reviews on mental health and psychiatric psychotherapeutic care during the pandemic.

resultsLarge sections of the population proved to be resilient in terms of mental health. Populations at risk showed increased stress, particularly children, adolescents, women, people with low socioeconomic status, people in nursing homes and healthcare workers. People with long/post-COVID were also particularly affected. At the same time there were significant restrictions on the provision of psychiatric psychotherapeutic care, particularly in the inpatient sector. Insufficient current data on the mental health of the population and a lack of surveillance of service utilization, despite an existing data basis, made it difficult for timely detection of stress and care restrictions and an adequate response for crisis management. The rigid sectorization of the mental healthcare system often prevented alternative outpatient care. DISCUSSION: The national mental health surveillance should be continued and further developed. Structures should be provided for the time-sensitive consolidation of data and the multiprofessional generation of recommendations in order to be able to detect and respond to challenges due to bottlenecks in the provision of care and stress in risk groups. Flexible, cross-sectoral mental healthcare should be made possible throughout Germany.

Indexed as

COVID-19Crisis InterventionMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesPandemicsAdolescentFemaleGermanyHumansCOVID-19Financing modelsHealthcare personnelHealth surveillanceRisk groups

Identifiers

PMID40169414
PMCPMC12058948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.