SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025
A systematic review and meta-analysis of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for the treatment of pain in chronic prostatitis.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-Surgical Management of Male Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A UPOINT-Guided Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a debilitating condition affecting 2-10% of men globally. Its symptoms, including pelvic pain, urinary problems, and reduced quality of life, vary widely. Despite extensive research, a definitive treatment remains elusive. Alpha-adrenergic antagonists are frequently used to manage urinary symptoms, while analgesics are employed for pain. However, the long-term efficacy of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for pelvic pain requires further investigation. CP/CPPS places a significant burden on healthcare systems and the economy. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of alpha-adrenergic antagonists in reducing pain symptoms in men with CP/CPPS compared to placebo.
methodsA systematic search of randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of alpha-adrenergic antagonists for the treatment of pain in CP/CPPS was conducted and captured all available studies (n = 680). After application of exclusion criteria, five studies were identified as suitable for inclusion.
resultsFour papers consisting of five studies, containing a total of 578 participants, were evaluated. The combined effects found no difference in pain relief between treated and control subjects for the data from the five studies in the meta-analysis (P = 0.106), with the 95% CI for the random effects model containing a value of 0.00.
conclusionIn adults with CP/CPPS, alpha-adrenergic antagonists were ineffective as monotherapy to treat pain. Further studies are needed to address possible confounding variables for alpha-adrenergic antagonist efficacy. These findings suggest that alpha-adrenergic antagonists as monotherapy are not effective for pain reduction in CP/CPPS and highlight the need for further research to explore combination therapies or other treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40169407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.