Trial reportGut and liver2025
Comparative Study of MiroCam MC2000 and PillCam SB3 in Detecting Small Bowel Bleeding: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.
Trial report in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent technological advances in video capsule endoscopy: a comprehensive review.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- AI-Assisted Double-Headed Capsule Endoscopy: Multicentre Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study Across Small Bowel Indications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing Small Bowel Imaging: Dual-Camera Capsule Endoscopy in Real-World Bleeding Evaluation.Gut and liver · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The MiroCam MC2000 (MC2000) is a double-tip capsule with a camera on each side. It is designed to provide more extensive visualization of the small bowel mucosa, potentially reducing the chance of missing lesions. This study aimed to compare the detection rates for lesions in the ampulla of Vater (AoV) and the small bowel of the MC2000 and the PillCam SB3 (SB3) for patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized crossover trial compared the lesion detection capabilities of the MC2000 and SB3 capsules, ingested one hour apart by patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. The primary outcome was the detection of lesions in the AoV, while the secondary outcome was the assessment of the detection of P1 and P2 lesions, known underlying causes of small bowel bleeding. Results: There was no significant difference in AoV lesion detection rates between the devices. However, MC2000 demonstrated significantly greater detection of red spots in patients with visible bleeding (p=0.018) and tended to detect a greater number of small bowel lesions, including P2 lesions. Minor complications included device stasis, with fewer incidents with the MC2000 than with the SB3, and one instance of small bowel retention due to ulcers. Conclusions: The MC2000's dual-camera system appears to enhance the detection of small bowel lesions over the SB3, especially for more important lesions. These findings suggest that the MC2000 may offer superior diagnostic capabilities for patients with suspected small bowel bleeding, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes (this trial registered KCT0005591).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.