Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169397›Full record

Trial reportGut and liver2025

Comparative Study of MiroCam MC2000 and PillCam SB3 in Detecting Small Bowel Bleeding: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.

Ji Eun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Jae Jun Park, Kyeong Ok Kim, Yehyun Park, Young Joo Yang, Hyun Joo Jang

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ji Eun KimDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2149-7979
Eun Ran KimDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-2565
Jae Jun ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9974-1658
Kyeong Ok KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5799-7436
Yehyun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8811-0631
Young Joo YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6325-1104
Hyun Joo JangDepartment of Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4424-1968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The MiroCam MC2000 (MC2000) is a double-tip capsule with a camera on each side. It is designed to provide more extensive visualization of the small bowel mucosa, potentially reducing the chance of missing lesions. This study aimed to compare the detection rates for lesions in the ampulla of Vater (AoV) and the small bowel of the MC2000 and the PillCam SB3 (SB3) for patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized crossover trial compared the lesion detection capabilities of the MC2000 and SB3 capsules, ingested one hour apart by patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. The primary outcome was the detection of lesions in the AoV, while the secondary outcome was the assessment of the detection of P1 and P2 lesions, known underlying causes of small bowel bleeding. Results: There was no significant difference in AoV lesion detection rates between the devices. However, MC2000 demonstrated significantly greater detection of red spots in patients with visible bleeding (p=0.018) and tended to detect a greater number of small bowel lesions, including P2 lesions. Minor complications included device stasis, with fewer incidents with the MC2000 than with the SB3, and one instance of small bowel retention due to ulcers. Conclusions: The MC2000's dual-camera system appears to enhance the detection of small bowel lesions over the SB3, especially for more important lesions. These findings suggest that the MC2000 may offer superior diagnostic capabilities for patients with suspected small bowel bleeding, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes (this trial registered KCT0005591).

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyGastrointestinal HemorrhageIntestine, SmallAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAmpulla of VaterAngioectasiaCapsule endoscopyDiverticulumObscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID40169397
PMCPMC12261129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.