ArticleMedical mycology2025
Availability and cost of antifungal therapy in Vietnam: A 5-year retrospective study.
Article in Medical mycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of intensive care unit staff regardingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Antifungal Agents in the 21st Century: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Infectious disease reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to antifungal agents for the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) varies significantly between countries. Limited access or high cost may contribute to the burden of IFIs. We aimed to investigate the availability and cost of antifungal treatment for IFIs in Vietnam. Procurement data from 2018 to 2022 was collected from the Drug Administration of Vietnam website. We calculated the cost per defined daily dose (DDD) and identified the manufacturing countries. We explored the pharmacotherapy cost of the four major IFIs if first-line agents were used in accordance with the Vietnam 2021 antifungal prescribing guideline. We also estimated the treatment expenditure in 2020 based on the estimated disease burden previously published and suggested cost-saving measures. At least 57.6 million USD was spent on 15.5 million DDD of antifungals in 5 years. Seven systemic antifungal agents were available in Vietnam. Caspofungin and micafungin were the least used but most expensive, whereas fluconazole and itraconazole were the most consumed but cheapest antifungals. Vietnam manufactured 70% of azole antifungals and relied on imports for the remaining antifungals consumed. We estimated the first-line pharmacological treatment for the estimated cases of four IFIs in 2020 to cost at least 209.1 million USD, which exceeded the actual spend in 2020. We discovered that antifungal agents for IFIs impose a substantial economic burden on Vietnam's healthcare system. We highlight the need for cost-effectiveness studies of expensive first-line medications. Efforts to mitigate this economic burden should include antifungal stewardship, prevention of IFIs, and sourcing from cost-effective manufacturers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.