ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2025
Investigating the Nanostructure Design Mechanism Behind the Hydrophobicity of the Biomimetic Surface.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wettability, a fundamental physicochemical property of functional materials that depends on their surface structure, has seen recent advances in understanding that have led to the development of superhydrophobic surfaces with applications in self-cleaning materials and antifogging coatings. Given the presence of a free energy barrier between the Cassie and Wenzel states, calculating this barrier provides a valuable means to assess surface hydrophobicity. We hypothesize that surface characteristics affect the free energy barrier between wetting states and that the determination of this barrier can be used to predict the hydrophobicity. Focused on models of a butterfly wing (striped surface) and a mosquito eye (pillared surface), this study employed many-body dissipative particle dynamics (mDPD) simulations to explore the relationship between the free energy barrier and surface roughness (height and spacing). For small-radius droplets, the height of the surface pattern predominantly influences the hydrophobicity. Conversely, for large-radius droplets, the spacing of the surface pattern is the dominant factor. Considering that the contact angle indicates static hydrophobicity, the free energy barrier is the indicator of dynamic hydrophobicity, which shows how well the surface can maintain its hydrophobicity under the impact of a droplet. This study underscores the advantages of the free energy barrier method in understanding dynamic hydrophobicity, which can be applied in evaluating high kinetic energy droplets onto surfaces, for example, automobiles, trains, and aircraft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.