Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169125›Full record

ArticlePneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)2025

[Representation of respiratory medicine in medical curricula in Germany: an online survey among final-year medical students and chief physicians].

Erik Büscher, Espen Elias Groth, Julia Wälscher, Thomas Bahmer, Matthias Raspe, Nina Sicker, Katharina Buschulte, Christoph Fisser

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erik Büscher *Klinik für Pneumologie, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Deutschland.
Espen Elias Groth *Abteilung für Pneumologie, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf GmbH, Grosshansdorf, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0003-0883-6366
Julia WälscherKlinik für Pneumologie, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Deutschland.
Thomas BahmerDeutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung (DZL), Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Großhansdorf, Deutschland.
Matthias RaspeFächerverbund für Infektiologie, Pneumologie und Intensivmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Nina SickerPneumologie, Klinik Donaustauf, Donaustauf, Deutschland.
Katharina BuschultePneumologie, Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg gGmbH, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Christoph FisserKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students' experiences in medical school may have a significant influence on their later choice of medical specialty, but so far, there has been a lack of objective data on how the subject of pneumology is perceived at German medical schools and where there may be potential for improvement.From July to November 2022, we conducted an online survey among final-year students at German medical schools, as well as chief physicians in the field of pneumology. Students were invited to participate by e-mail via their faculties and the survey was further advertised by the Federal Representation of Medical Students in Germany (BVMD). Chief physicians were contacted via the mailing list of the German Respiratory Society (DGP).We received n=279 responses from students (from 95% of German medical faculties) and n=53 responses from chief physicians in pneumology. Both groups considered pneumology to be rather underrepresented or underrepresented compared to other specialties in the medical curricula (62% of students, 89% of chief physicians). Students attributed the greatest influence on their career aspirations by far to theoretical knowledge, practical experience during internships, clinical traineeships and the final (practical) year of medical school (89% of responses), with value being attributed to good and appreciative supervision and the opportunity to work independently. In a regression analysis, practical learning experience in the field of pneumology during the final year of medical school was particularly associated with students' later career choice for pneumology. From the students' perspective, practical teaching (91% of responses) as well as other courses requiring personal attendance (51%) should be strengthened. Chief physicians described difficulties recruiting junior staff into the field of pneumology and highlighted the need to stress the importance of the subject and the financing of teaching at medical schools.Implementation of a more comprehensive, practice-oriented training in respiratory medicine seems essential for promoting the recruitment of the next generation of physicians into the field of pneumology. The results presented in this paper form a basis for giving more weight to pneumology in medical school curricula and serve as an aid for decision-makers at medical faculties and teaching hospitals in Germany.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceCurriculumPhysiciansPulmonary MedicineStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40169125
PMCPMC12695423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.