Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169022›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Illusory speeding-up and slowing-down of objects moving at constant speed emerges from natural motion detection algorithms.

Emmeline L Handojo, Szonya Durant, Johannes M Zanker, Andrew Isaac Meso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmeline L HandojoFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Szonya DurantDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0668-5093
Johannes M ZankerDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
Andrew Isaac MesoDepartment of Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-7726

Funding

King's College London
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The footsteps illusion is a perceptual illusion in which two bars moving at the same constant speed on a stripey background are seen as alternately accelerating and decelerating like footsteps. The cortical mechanisms that give rise to footsteps and similar illusions remain to be fully understood and may reveal important neural computations. Using an implementation of the biologically inspired correlational model of motion detection, the 2-Dimensional Motion Detector, this study had three aims. First, reproducing perceptual speed oscillations in model simulations. Second, mapping empirical reports of multiple illusion configurations onto model outputs. Third, inferring from the successful model, the perceptual role of multi-scale spatio-temporal channels. We developed a 2-Dimensional Motion Detector implementation adding a global (single value) frame-by-frame dynamic readout to quantify continuous and oscillating response components. We confirmed that an expected signature oscillatory motion response corresponded to the footsteps illusion, demonstrating that its amplitude varied according to empirically measured illusion strength. We showed that with a global readout, the inherent pattern and contrast dependence of correlation detectors is sufficient to reproduce the surprising perceptual illusion. This evidence suggests spacetime correlation may be a fundamental sensory computation across species, with complementary filtering and global pooling operations adapted for various complex phenomena.

Indexed as

Detection AlgorithmsIllusionsMotion PerceptionAlgorithmsHumanscontrastfootsteps illusionglobal motionlocal motionReichardt detectors

Identifiers

PMID40169022
PMCPMC11961266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.