Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40168843›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2025

Mapping the antibody response to Lassa virus vaccination of non-human primates.

Adrian S Enriquez, Ruben Diaz Avalos, Diptiben Parekh, Christopher L Cooper, Gavin Morrow, Thomas W Geisbert, Christopher L Parks, Kathryn M Hastie, Erica Ollmann Saphire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A multi-epitope vaccine targetingFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adrian S EnriquezCenter for Vaccine Innovation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Ruben Diaz AvalosCenter for Vaccine Innovation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Diptiben ParekhCenter for Vaccine Innovation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Christopher L CooperInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative; New York, NY, 10004, USA.
Gavin MorrowInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative; New York, NY, 10004, USA.
Thomas W GeisbertGalveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Christopher L ParksInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative; New York, NY, 10004, USA.
Kathryn M HastieCenter for Vaccine Innovation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. Electronic address: kmhastie@lji.org.
Erica Ollmann SaphireCenter for Vaccine Innovation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA; Dept. of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. Electronic address: erica@lji.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLassa fever, caused by Lassa virus, is a severe disease, endemic in Western Africa, for which no vaccines or therapeutics are yet approved. Understanding the immune responses elicited by candidate vaccines is key for approval, including characterisation of antibody epitopes recognised and capacity for neutralisation.

methodsHere we used negative-stain electron microscopy polyclonal antibody epitope mapping (EMPEM), in-vitro pseudovirus neutralisation assays, and biophysical antibody competition assays to uncover components of polyclonal antibody responses elicited in nonhuman primates 26 days after receipt of a single immunisation with a fully protective, recombinant, replication-competent vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine bearing the Lassa virus glycoprotein GPC.

findingsAlthough the vaccinee sera are overall poorly-neutralising, we do directly visualise, within the polyclonal pool, antibodies targeting epitopes on GPC that are consistent with neutralisation, as well as competition with known neutralising mAbs. Nearly every animal, for example, produced antibodies that compete with mAbs against GP1-A and GPC-A neutralising epitopes. The most abundant classes of antibodies, however, are directed against interior interfaces of GPC, while other antibodies recognise post-fusion GPC epitopes not consistent with neutralisation.

interpretationIt may be that some individual antibodies in the pool are neutralising, but that the abundance of non-neutralising epitopes reduces potency as measured at the polyclonal level. The finding, however, neutralisation-consistent sites and competition with known neutralising antibodies are important steps in vaccine design toward eliciting more potent neutralisation.

fundingA complete list of funding bodies that supported this study is presented in the Funding section.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralAntibody FormationEpitope MappingLassa FeverLassa virusViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingEpitopesHumansVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopesViral VaccinesElectron microscopy polyclonal antibody epitope mappingLassa virusNeutralising antibodyVaccine design

Identifiers

PMID40168843
PMCPMC11999075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.