SynthesisEBioMedicine2025
Genetic association studies in critically ill patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Determinants of T-Cell Homeostasis in Critical Illness: An Exploratory Analysis of Immune Gene Variants and TREC Dynamics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Genomic and integrative based progression biomarker discovery in adult sepsis: toward clinical stratification and precision medicine.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritical illness is complex, and genetic research holds the potential to uncover underlying disease mechanisms. However, existing research results have not been systematically summarized. This study aims to compile all genetic association studies in critically ill patients and assess their risks of bias.
methodsWe systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42021209744) and conducted a bias risk assessment of identified studies using a newly developed risk-of-bias assessment tool for genetic association studies. We compiled all significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the studies identified in our systematic review and conducted a lookup in the results of two genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in critically ill patients.
findingsWe identified a total of 61 studies that evaluated genetic variants with various traits in adult intensive care patients, encompassing a total of 126 genetic loci and focussing on six clustered critical care-related traits. Assessment of the risk of bias across these studies revealed that 97% of the studies demonstrated some concerns or high risk of bias and only two studies (3%, both GWAS), had an overall low risk of bias. Only two significantly associated SNPs emerged from the two studies assessed to have a low risk of bias. One SNP (rs4957796) in FER was associated with 28-day survival (p = 3.4 × 10
interpretationOur systematic review underscored a deficiency in high-quality genetic research in critical care medicine. The detected gaps emphasize an urgent need for additional rigorous genetic association studies that are preferably genome-wide, to enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of critical illness.
fundingWenbo Zhang was financially supported by a grant from the China Scholarship Council (File no. 202006210041). Carlos Flores was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI23/00980 and CB06/06/1088) and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, "A way of making Europe" from the European Union; and the agreement OA23/043 with Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables (ITER) to strengthen scientific and technological education, training, research, development and scientific innovation in genomics, epidemiological surveillance based on massive sequencing, personalized medicine, and biotechnology. Eva Suarez-Pajes was financially supported by Agencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la Información de la Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento y Empleo y por el Fondo Social Europeo (FSE) Programa Operativo Integrado de Canarias 2014-2020, Eje 3 Tema Prioritario 74 (85%) (TESIS2022010042).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.