ArticlePloS one2025
Pupillary responses to bright and dark stimuli in individuals with autism spectrum disorders.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often exhibit difficulties in sensory processing, including visual hypersensitivity such as photophobia. This study investigates the neural mechanisms underlying photophobia in participants with ASD by analyzing pupillary responses. To achieve this, we examined the amplitude and velocity gradient (latency) of these responses. Pupillary responses were recorded using an eye-tracking system in participants with ASD (n = 17) and typically developing (TD) (n = 23). Stimuli alternated between bright (89.03 cd/m2) and dark (0.07 cd/m2) conditions following a dim state (2.75 cd/m2) with intervals of five seconds in Experiment 1 and 30 seconds in Experiment 2. The sensory profile test (AASP-J) showed that hypersensitivity was significantly defined in the ASD group than in the TD group. The pupillary response in the ASD group often featured missing values due to blinking during rapid alternation between bright and dark conditions, resulting in a decrease in the total number of participants. Specifically, only eight of the 17 participants in the ASD group and 20 of the 23 participants in the TD group remained for analysis in Experiment 1, and in Experiment 2, 15 of the 17 participants in the ASD group and 20 of the 23 participants in the TD group remained for analysis. In the dim state, pupillary diameter was large in the ASD and TD group in both experiments, while the pupil diameter decreased in the TD group in Experiment 2. In both experiments, maximum amplitude and its latency showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the velocity gradient for the early mydriatic process in the dark condition was significantly faster in the ASD group. ASD individuals with hypersensitivity tend to have large pupil diameters under the dim state, as well as rapid dilation in the dark condition. These results may suggest a problem in the sympathetic nervous system, which controls pupil constriction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.