Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40168424›Full record

ReviewChemPlusChem2025

Two-Phase Epoxidations with Micellar Catalysts: Insights, Limitations, and Perspectives.

Markus Hegelmann, Mirza Cokoja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemPlusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Markus HegelmannDepartment of Chemistry and Catalysis Research Center, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Ernst-Otto-Fischer Straße 1, D-85748, Garching bei München, Germany.
Mirza CokojaDepartment of Chemistry and Catalysis Research Center, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Ernst-Otto-Fischer Straße 1, D-85748, Garching bei München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3144-4678

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 326649877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biphasic molecular catalysis is a promising strategy for combining catalyst recycling with the synthesis of advanced chemical products. The anchoring of catalysts to surfactants in water allows for both catalyst solubility in aqueous media and a simple separation from the organic product. In biphasic epoxidations, this approach allows the use of environmentally benign hydrogen peroxide as oxidant. However, challenges remain due to mass transport limitations between the aqueous and organic phase, incompatibilities in the multicomponent system, and side reactions in the acidic medium. Hence, the development of surface-active catalysts that enable controlled phase separation from all other components is highlighted in this concept article.

Indexed as

additivesbiphasic catalysisepoxidationionic liquidsstimuli‐responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID40168424
PMCPMC12143460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.