Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40168297›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Artificial intelligence (AI) in nursing administration: Challenges and opportunities.

Omar Qaladi, Mukhlid Alshammari, Abdullah Abdulrahim Almalki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Omar QaladiCommunity and Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8681-1562
Mukhlid AlshammariNursing Department, College of Applied Medical Science, University of Hafr Albatin, Hafr Albatin, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3872-3012
Abdullah Abdulrahim AlmalkiMinistry of Health, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming nursing administration by enhancing operational efficiency and supporting data-driven decision-making. This study explores registered nurses perceptions of AI in Saudi Arabia, focusing on both challenges and opportunities. A cross-sectional survey of 202 nurses revealed that 93.6% believe AI improves understanding, and 88.1% feel it enhances the quality of learning. Significant correlations were found between years of experience and AI usage (r =  0.342, p <  0.001) and between sources of information and AI perception (r =  0.146, p =  0.039). While 80.7% expressed concern that AI could reduce critical thinking, 76.8% feared job displacement. These findings underscore the need for training, ethical guidelines, and support systems to foster effective AI integration, enhancing nursing practice while addressing concerns around professional roles.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNursesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40168297
PMCPMC11960905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.