ArticlePloS one2025
Platelet rich fibrin and commercial sealants for dural closure in neurosurgery: An in vitro study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Novel adjunctive technologies for the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Pooled it
- Intraoperative Agents for Hemostasis and Dural Reconstruction in Neurosurgery.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Review
- Multilayer dural repair using absorbable artificial dura in the posterior fossa: A case report on the "sandwich technique".Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Sticky Bone: Advances and Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWatertight closure of the dura mater is essential after neurosurgical interventions to avoid complications such meningitis, intracranial hypotension and surgical site infections. In addition to conventional suturing techniques, various biomaterials have been proposed as sealants to minimize the risk of leakage. We previously reported that patient derived platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), an autologous biomaterial, significantly improves watertight dural closure when applied as an onlay over a standard running suture. To demonstrate the efficacy of this method, we aimed to compare this orthobiological approach with other commercially available sealants.
methodsWe utilized an in vitro testing device that allowed for the assessment of watertight dura mater closure via hydrostatic testing. On our testing phantom using freshly harvested bovine dura maters, a standardized 20-mm incision was closed using a running suture, and the leak pressure was measured initially without (primary leak pressure) and subsequently with on lay augmentation (secondary leak pressure) using either PRF, fibrinogen- and thrombin-coated collagen patch (TachoSil®), collagen matrix graft (DuraGen®), Polyethylenglykol (PEG) and polyethylene glycol ester and trilysine amine hydrogel solution (DuraSeal®), polyethylene glycol, protein-reactive polyethylene glycol monomer coated collagen matrix (Hemopatch®) or polyethylenimine component autospray sealant (Adherus®).
resultsThe outcomes demonstrate that the usage of a dural onlay in addition to the standard running suture exhibited a substantial improvement in leak pressure compared to the running suture alone. Specifically, the median leak pressure was improved by 3.5 times, where the combined approach was able to withstand 38 cm H2O, whereas the running suture alone had a median leak pressure of 11 cm H2O. Upon evaluating the performance of the sealants, we identified two categories of dural sealants: a medium performance group (30 ± 2 cm H2O) comprised of Adherus® (31 cm H2O), DuraGen® (31 cm H2O), and Hemopatch® (28 cm H2O), and a high-performance group composed of DuraSeal® (45.5 cm H2O), and TachoSil® (41 cm H2O). Patient-derived PRF was able to withstand a max pressure of 45 cm H2O, falling into the high-performance group. Of all the sealants tested in this study, the PRF based patch demonstrated the lowest variance in leak pressure among all the tested sealants.
conclusionsAutologous platelet-rich fibrin in a two-step procedure displayed enhanced augmentation and reinforced watertight closure of the dura mater, exhibiting a four-fold increase in leak pressure compared to standard running suture alone. Among other commonly utilized commercial sealants, it ranked second with demonstrated consistency in its performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.