ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting a failure of postoperative thromboprophylaxis in non-small cell lung cancer: A stacking machine learning approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its surgery significantly increase the venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. This study explored the VTE risk factors and established a machine-learning model to predict a failure of postoperative thromboprophylaxis.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery between January 2018 and November 2022. The patients were randomized 7:3 to the training and test sets. Nine machine learning models were constructed. The three most predictive machine-learning classifiers were chosen as the first layer of the stacking machine-learning model, and logistic regression was the second layer of the meta-learning model.
resultsThis study included 362 patients, including 58 (16.0%) with VTE. Based on the multivariable logistic regression analysis, age, platelets, D-dimers, albumin, smoking history, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 21 mutation were used to develop the nine machine-learning models. LGBM Classifier, RandomForest Classifier, and GNB were chosen for the first layer of the stacking machine learning model. The area under the received operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the stacking machine learning model in the training/test set were 0.984/0.979, 0.949/0.954, 0.935/1.000, and 0.958/0.887, respectively. In the validation set, the final stacking machine learning model demonstrated an ROC AUC of 0.983, accuracy of 0.937, sensitivity of 0.978, and specificity of 0.947. The decision curve analyses revealed high benefits.
conclusionThe stacking machine learning model based on EGFR mutation and clinical characteristics had a predictive value for postoperative VTE in patients with NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.