ArticlePloS one2025
Characterization of Human Balance through a Reinforcement Learning-based Muscle Controller.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental quantification of balance using whole-body stability regions from postural sway exercises.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Design of dynamic adaptive control framework for exoskeleton robot driven by neuromuscular signal based on deep reinforcement learning.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective characterization of human balance remains a challenge and clinical observation-based balance tests during physical rehabilitation are often affected by subjectivity. On the other hand, computational approaches mostly rely on center of pressure (COP) tracking and inverted pendulum models, which do not capture the multi-joint and muscle contributions to whole-body balance. This study proposes a novel musculoskeletal modeling and control methodology to investigate human balancing capabilities in the center of mass (COM) state space. A musculoskeletal model is integrated with a balance controller trained through reinforcement learning (RL) to explore the limits of dynamic balance during postural sway. The RL framework consists of two interlinked neural networks (balance recovery and muscle coordination) and is trained using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) under multiple training strategies. By exploring recovery from random initial COM states with a trained controller, a balance region (BR) is obtained that encloses successful state-space trajectories. Comparing BRs obtained from different trained controllers with the analytical postural stability limits of a linear inverted pendulum model, we observe a similar trend in COM balanced states, but reduced recoverable areas. Furthermore, the effects of muscle weakness and neural excitation delay on the BRs are investigated, revealing reduced balancing capability in the COM state space. The novel approach of determining regions of stability through learning muscular balance controllers provides a promising avenue for personalized balance assessments and objective quantification of balance capability in humans with different health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.