ArticlePloS one2025
Psychometric properties of the Bangla version of the sense of coherence scale among university students in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSense of coherence is a key concept in psychological science that contributes to mental health by helping people cope with various stressors in their daily lives. A literature review demonstrated the unavailability of a tool for measuring sense of coherence in Bangladesh. This study aimed to translate the 13-item Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13) into the Bangla language and to examine its validity, dimensionality, and reliability.
methodAfter translating the SOC-13, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 510 undergraduate students at a university in Bangladesh from July to October 2021. Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis to analyze the structural validity of the Bangla SOC-13 scale, and by examining correlations with related constructs (self-esteem, well-being, and psychological distress). The alpha coefficient was calculated to examine internal consistency. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 and R statistical software.
resultsA total of 320 respondents provided valid responses (response rate: 62.7%). The structural validity of the SOC-13, as examined through confirmatory factor analysis, was consistent across studies (a three-factor structure with an acceptable fit), and convergent validity was evidenced through a statistically significant positive relationships between sense of coherence and both self-esteem and well-being, as well as criterion validity was supported by a significant negative relationship with psychological distress. The internal consistency of the total scores by the coefficient alpha was good (α = 0.74), whereas the alphas of each subscale showed mediocre to fair reliability.
conclusionThe Bangla version of the SOC-13 showed good construct validity, acceptable criterion validity, and good reliability based on overall internal consistency. Thus, it can be used to assess sense of coherence in young adults, although there is scope for further examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.