ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Reactivation of memory-associated neurons induces downstream suppression of competing neuronal populations.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hippocampal engrams configure prefrontal context representations to guide flexible decisions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Engram Synapses and Synapse Dynamics in Memory Processing.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
- Reactivation of memory-associated neurons induces downstream suppression of competing neuronal populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inducing apparent memory recall by tagging and optogenetically reactivating cells in the hippocampus was demonstrated over a decade ago. However, the hippocampal dynamics resulting from this reactivation remain largely unknown. While calcium imaging is commonly used as a measure of neuronal activity, GCaMP, the most common calcium indicator, cannot be used with optogenetic neuronal reactivation because both require blue light excitation. To resolve this overlap, we demonstrate optogenetic reactivation with a red-shifted opsin, ChrimsonR. We then conduct dual-color calcium imaging in CA1 during memory reactivation in DG. In addition to measuring population dynamics in CA1, CA1 cells tagged during the original experience were identified. In the fear-conditioned animals (FC+), nontagged cells in CA1 decreased their firing rate during stimulation, while tagged cells maintained their activity level. In the FC+ animals, as the behavioral effect of stimulation decreased across days, so did the changes in neural activity during stimulation. Our results both demonstrate the technical feasibility of calcium imaging during optogenetic reactivation of memory-associated neurons and advance our understanding of the dynamics underlying this reactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.