ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Pain Assessment of Horses With Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TMHS) at Rest Between Episodes.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic utility of trigeminocervical reflex and quantitative sensory testing in horses with trigeminal-mediated headshaking.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide concentration in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in horses affected by trigeminal-mediated headshaking.Equine veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Erratum for "Pain Assessment of Horses With Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TMHS) at Rest Between Episodes".Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile there is agreement that horses experience pain during the actual headshaking attacks, there is still a lack of research about the time between the individual episodes in this species.
objectivesTo evaluate the signs of pain in horses with TMHS at rest in the absence of common triggering factors. ANIMALS: Twenty TMHS horses (not head shaking at the time of pain assessment), 20 horses with colic, and 20 clinically healthy horses.
methodsDescriptive study assessing pain in TMHS horses during the absence of clinical signs using the Horse Grimace scale (HGS). To grade the pain shown with TMHS, horses with moderate gastrointestinal pain conditions and a healthy horses' group were also included. For evaluation, videos were taken on two consecutive days from both sides of the face (healthy, TMHS) or before analgesics were applied (colic). Eight photos per horse were extracted from the videos, randomized, and evaluated by three examiner groups, each comprising two persons: (a) last-year veterinary medicine students without previous use of the HGS, (b) experienced veterinarians without experience in using the HGS, and (c) experienced veterinarians who regularly apply the HGS. All examiners were blinded to the underlying condition.
resultsMedian HGS scores in the groups (healthy, gastrointestinal, TMHS) differed significantly from each other (p < 0.05). Healthy horses had median HGS scores below 2 (median 1.2, range: 0.1-2.4), whereas TMHS horses had higher median HGS scores (5.6, range 2.4-7.4), and colic horses had the highest HGS scores (6.6, range: 3.8-8.4). There was a statistically significant difference for all facial action units (FAU) when the different horse groups were compared (p < 0.05). Effect sizes were large for the healthy horses' group (ES-1.23) and for the colic horses (ES 0.86), and small to medium for the TMHS horses (ES 0.37). CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The results of this study show that pain occurs between individual TMHS attacks in severely affected horses and that the quality of life of these horses must be questioned and evaluated individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.