Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40168025›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Accuracy of Medicare Information Provided by State Health Insurance Assistance Programs.

Kacey Dugan, Ilse Peterson, Allison Dorneo, Melissa M Garrido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kacey DuganFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath, Washington, DC.
Ilse PetersonFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath, Washington, DC.
Allison DorneoDepartment of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Melissa M GarridoDepartment of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Medicare beneficiaries, particularly those dually eligible for Medicaid, must navigate complex coverage options. The State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) provides counseling on Medicare options, but little is known about the quality of counseling sessions. Objective: To characterize experiences connecting to SHIP counselors, and to characterize the accuracy and completeness of information provided by counselors in response to questions about Medicare coverage options. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study of 131 SHIP sites across the US, mystery shoppers posed as individuals newly eligible for Medicare. Shops occurred via telephone, in-person, and videoconference encounters from September 2023 to August 2024. Statistical analysis was performed from August to September 2024. Exposure: Mystery shoppers followed scripts with questions about coverage decisions corresponding to general Medicare eligibility and dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid. Main Outcomes and Measures: Responses were categorized as (1) accurate and complete, (2) accurate but incomplete, (3) not substantive, and (4) incorrect. This was a descriptive study without hypotheses. Results: Shoppers attempted 306 encounters. Of these, 122 (39.9%) could not be completed, most often because shoppers did not receive return calls. Within the 184 completed shops, the mean (SD) percentage of accurate and complete answers was 40.0% (25.7%). The percentage of responses with accurate answers (whether complete or incomplete) ranged from 26.1% (when asked whether a specific clinician was in network for a specific plan) to 94.3% (when asked about differences between traditional Medicare [TM] and Medicare Advantage [MA]). Responses were unlikely to be inaccurate (mean [SD], 6.7% [5.4%]). Fewer than half of counselors (44.8% [43 of 96]) mentioned Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs) as an option for mystery shoppers posing as dual eligibles. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of the accuracy of Medicare information provided by SHIP counselors, shoppers encountered challenges in reaching SHIP sites, indicating possible capacity constraints; responses varied in accuracy and completeness, with better performance on questions about TM vs MA comparisons, and weaker performance on questions about integrated care plans and specific MA plan details. Given recent growth in MA and federal efforts to counter deceptive marketing practices from agents or brokers-in part by directing beneficiaries to SHIPs-policymakers should consider providing SHIP with additional resources for training and capacity improvements.

Indexed as

MedicareCross-Sectional StudiesEligibility DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40168025
PMCPMC11962663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.