ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Prospective survey exploring decision-making among patients pursuing oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy: Seeking certainty or harboring hope?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the extent to which patients pursuing medically-indicated fertility preservation (FP) prioritize reproductive certainty vs. hope, and to correlate specific FP strategies with post-cycle satisfaction, anxiety, and optimism.
methodsProspective survey of patients with ovaries 18-45y requiring fertility-compromising therapy having completed a FP consult at an academic fertility center from 10/2021-2/2023.
resultsAmong 136 eligible patients, 70 completed the survey. Of those planning FP, 35 planned egg freezing (57.4%), 16 embryo freezing (26.2%), and 10 both (16.4%). Those freezing eggs were younger (29.7 ± 6.5y) vs. those freezing embryos (35.8 ± 4.5y) or both (30.9 ± 6.1y) (p = 0.01). While those freezing embryos were more likely to be married (12/16, 75%), 33% of married individuals froze at least some eggs. Of those freezing embryos, 88.5% said they would want to know if their embryos were abnormal; however, only 46.2% planned pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). Fifty-three patients ultimately completed ≥ 1 cycle: 64.1% eggs, 30.2% embryos, and 5.7% both. Among those completing the post-cycle survey (n = 42), cycle satisfaction varied by FP strategy, from 62% for embryos to 96% for eggs and 100% for both (p = 0.013). Anxiety measure scores were higher pre- vs. post-cycle (median [IQR] = 8 [6-12] vs. 6 [0-8], p < 0.001), whereas optimism measure scores were similar throughout.
conclusionsFP decisions are nuanced and individualized. Notably, patients freezing eggs who therefore had less concrete information about reproductive potential endorsed higher cycle satisfaction. More thorough understanding of this complex decision-making may help optimize counseling and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.