Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167948›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2025

A historical view of the development of corneal transplantation: from penetrating keratoplasty to selective transplantation of the finest corneal layers.

Katharina A Heger, Daniel Egger, Gerald Schmidinger, Christian Skorpik, Sebastian M Waldstein, Niklas Pircher

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katharina A HegerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Liechtensteinstraße 67, 2130, Mistelbach, Austria.
Daniel EggerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Liechtensteinstraße 67, 2130, Mistelbach, Austria.
Gerald SchmidingerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian SkorpikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Liechtensteinstraße 67, 2130, Mistelbach, Austria.
Sebastian M WaldsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Liechtensteinstraße 67, 2130, Mistelbach, Austria.
Niklas PircherDepartment of Ophthalmology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Liechtensteinstraße 67, 2130, Mistelbach, Austria. Niklas.Pircher@mistelbach.lknoe.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replacement of damaged corneal tissue with a clear transplant represents a viable solution for restoring vision in patients with corneal blindness. Among organ transplants, corneal transplantation occupies a unique status due to the cornea's lack of vascularization. This avascular nature makes immune compatibility testing between donor and recipient unnecessary and reduces the risk of transplant rejection, making corneal transplantation the most successful organ transplant procedure worldwide. Over the past century, corneal transplantation has undergone a transformative journey, evolving from full-thickness keratoplasty to highly refined techniques that selectively target individual diseased corneal layers. These modern lamellar approaches aim for faster recovery times and reduced rejection rates. The global demand for corneal graft tissue far exceeds the availability of donor tissue, leading to prolonged waiting times for patients in need of transplantation. Modern therapeutic strategies are expected to support or potentially even replace transplantation of corneal layers in the future.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationKeratoplasty, PenetratingAustriaGraft RejectionHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansCorneal graftingEvolutionEye bankingLamellar keratoplastyPenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.