ArticleLa Radiologia medica2025
A comprehensive study on the radiomic score derived from perineural invasion in gastric cancer and its correlation with the overall survival of patients.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of novel radiomics nomogram model based on preoperative CT to predict lymphovascular tumor embolus and recurrence-free survival in early T1-2a stage lung adenocarcinomas.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Application of ultrasound-guided localization technology in early gastric cancer surgery and prognostic analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Mapping the global research landscape of perineural invasion in gastrointestinal malignancies: a bibliometric visualization analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Pathomics Signature for Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerineural invasion (PNI) is closely related to the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, a noninvasive tool for accurately and reliably predicting the PNI is lacking.
methodsThe clinical and imaging data of 278 patients from institution I and 39 patients from institution II were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomic features were extracted from the intratumoral and peritumoral regions. Seven independent machine learning (ML) algorithms are used to develop the models. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis were carried out to compare 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) differences among various subgroups based on PNI and radiomic scores.
resultsT stage and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were significantly correlated with the PNI (P < 0.01). The OS of patients with different PNI status was significantly different (P < 0.05). Gradient boosting tree is the best ML algorithm. The area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of the optimal radiomics model in the internal test set and external test set were 0.901 and 0.886, respectively. After the introduction of clinical variables T stage and LVI, the performance of the model further improved in predicting the PNI of GC patients, with the AUC of 0.904 in the internal test set and 0.886 in the external test set. The difference in 3-year OS (P = 0.005) and 5-year OS (P = 0.015) among patients with varying radiomic scores was statistically significant.
conclusionRadiomics combined with intratumoral and peritumoral features is feasible for evaluating the PNI of GC patients. The prognosis of patients with different radiomic scores was statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40167935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.