SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy versus reperfusion therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07290751 (Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined With Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined With Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of adjuvant tirofiban versus intravenous thrombolysis alone in acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of early tirofiban administration after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled RESCUE BT3 trial protocol.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Successful anesthesia management for middle cerebral artery thrombectomy in a patient with asynchronous cardio-cerebral infarction: a case report.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Review
- Endovascular therapy in large vessel occlusion stroke: navigating critical debates.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Real-world safety of tirofiban: a disproportionality analysis using data from FAERS and WHO-VigiAccess.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have shown an additional benefit of tirofiban administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who underwent reperfusion therapy. According to the last revised guidelines, the efficacy of tirofiban in treating AIS is not well-established. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy with tirofiban compared to reperfusion therapy alone in treating AIS. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the use of tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy in AIS patients within 72 h after the onset of symptoms with 90 days minimum follow-up. We employed risk ratio (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the measure of effect size using a random-effects model. We included seven RCTs comprising 1607 patients, of whom 815 (50.7%) received tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy and 792 (49.3%) received reperfusion therapy alone (no-tirofiban). The addition of tirofiban to the reperfusion therapy resulted in a higher rate of favorable outcomes (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11-1.40; p < 0.001) with less functional disability (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.98; p < 0.05). The administration of tirofiban significantly improved the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) after seven days (MD - 2.27; 95% CI - 4.32 to - 0.22; p = 0.03). A similar rate of successful revascularization was observed between groups (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.97-1.45; p = 0.09). Tirofiban did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (RR 1.47; 95% CI 0.98-2.19; p = 0.06), but increase the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), particularly in the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) subgroup analysis (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.03-1.51; p = 0.02). Mortality rates were similar between groups RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.38; p = 0.72). The addition of tirofiban to reperfusion therapy was associated with improved functional outcomes, without a significant increase in ICH. NIHSS after seven days of stroke onset was significantly improved by tirofiban. There was an increase in any ICH events, particularly in EVT patients. Mortality was not significantly altered by tirofiban.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40167884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.