Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167870›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2025

The current landscape of artificial intelligence in computational histopathology for cancer diagnosis.

Aaditya Tiwari, Aruni Ghose, Maryam Hasanova, Sara Socorro Faria, Srishti Mohapatra, Sola Adeleke, Stergios Boussios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aaditya TiwariBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Aruni GhoseBarts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK City of London Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. aruni.ghose1@gmail.com.
Maryam HasanovaOncoFlowTM, London, UK.
Sara Socorro FariaLaboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Cell Biology, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Srishti MohapatraGeneral Internal Medicine Doctorate Programme, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Sola AdelekeSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Stergios BoussiosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) marks a frontier in histopathologic analysis shift towards the clinic, becoming a mainstream choice to interpret histological images. Surveying studies assessing AI applications in histopathology from 2013 to 2024, we review key methods (including supervised, unsupervised, weakly supervised and transfer learning) in deep learning-based pattern recognition in computational histopathology for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Deep learning methods also showed utility in identifying a wide range of genetic mutations and standard pathology biomarkers from routine histology. This survey of 41 primary studies also encompasses key regions of AI applicability in histopathology in a multi-cancer review while marking prospects to introduce AI into the clinical setting with key examples including Swarm Learning and Data Fusion.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCancerComputationalDeep LearningHistopathologyMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40167870
PMCPMC11961855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.