ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025
A Qualitative Study To Understand Parental, Health Care Provider and WIC Nutritionist Perspectives on Early Childhood Beverage Choices for WIC-enrolled Families in a Southeastern US Health System.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing Caregiver Comfort With Linking the Health Care System and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNutritionists for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), along with healthcare providers, can influence beverage choices for young children in WIC-enrolled families. Coordination of messaging about beverages and between-provider communication may be important for facilitating behavior change.
methodsIn preparation for a planned intervention, during Spring through Fall of 2021, we conducted a qualitative study to understand perceptions around family beverage choice discussions across three groups: parents of WIC-enrolled children, WIC nutritionists and practicing clinicians. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 individuals, with sample size determined a priori. Thematic content analysis was used to summarize transcribed data.
resultsThere was broad agreement that children should not consume sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), but disagreement on tap water safety. Both clinicians and WIC nutritionists reported educating families about healthy drink choices, and parents recalled similar messages during these conversations. Parents were very supportive of fruit juice as part of the WIC package, with near universal opposition among clinicians. Many parents expressed concerns about tap water. Both provider groups perceived difficulty in reaching out to each other, and felt more communication would be helpful. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings highlight a need for more regular communication between WIC nutritionists and children's healthcare providers within our system, and more consistent parental education on juice and tap water safety. Future studies could evaluate whether these types of communication gaps and perceptions are regional or more widespread across the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.