ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Using differential reinforcement and extinction to increase specificity in cheetah scat detection dogs.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Olfactory cognition.Animal cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection dogs are trained using limited samples and then expected to generalize this ability to recognize wild samples while maintaining specificity to a target category. Such specificity is critical because dogs are often used to locate targets that are difficult to visually identify. Little is known about how to regain target specificity when false alerts become frequent or established. This case study assessed the training of two conservation dogs that alerted to off-target caracal (Caracal caracal) and leopard (Panthera pardus) scat samples during training to detect cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) scat. The dogs were trained using an extinction-based differential reinforcement protocol consisting of the non delivery of reinforcement to reduce false alerts to caracal and leopard scats while maintaining sensitivity to cheetah scats. All training was conducted in situ in Samburu County, Kenya, by local handlers under the guidance of trainers. Sessions were filmed and coded for false alerts, true alerts, and where possible, misses and correct dismissals. Within four training sessions, both dogs exhibited an extinction burst demonstrated by an increase and then decrease in both the number and duration of false alerts. They continued to make fewer false alerts for the remainder of the training program. These results demonstrate the ability to reduce false alerts in operational detection dogs via extinction coupled with systematic reinforcement of desired behaviors. This case study highlights the importance of record-keeping and handling protocols for training samples. To our knowledge, this study represents the first publication on an extinction protocol to reduce false alerts in detection dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.