SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2025
Comparison of The efficacy and safety of fractional erbium: YAG laser in combination with Tranexamic acid delivery by different methods versus Tranexamic acid alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Q-Switched 1064 nm Fractional Laser with Intradermal Tranexamic Acid for Melasma: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentary disorder characterized by light-brown to bluish-gray patches. No single treatment is universally efficacious. Thus, a combination treatment should be applied. This Systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of fractional erbium: YAG laser combined with tranexamic acid (TXA) delivery methods compared to TXA alone for melasma treatment. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, including Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series of patients diagnosed with melasma, excluding studies with high bias risk or low quality, studies involved patients with active skin infections, inflammatory skin conditions, or systemic diseases affecting healing, patients with keloid history or with concurrent anticoagulant or steroid use, and non-compliance with protocols. Studies should report at least one of the following outcomes such as improvement in melasma, incidence/severity of adverse events, objective pigment reduction, or treatment effect duration and relapse time. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model (restricted maximum-likelihood estimator) to account for study variability. We included 13 studies involving a total of 585 participants. Most studies involved between 30 and 60 participants. Subgroup analysis of the modified Melasma Area and severity index showed no overall effect (standardized mean differences (SMDs) = -0.0802, p = 0.8685), with high heterogeneity (I² = 92.5%, p < 0.0001). A large positive effect was observed at 3 months (SMD = 1.9802) and a negative effect at 6 months (SMD = -0.7190) with significant differences. The overall effect of interventions on the Melasma Area and severity index was minimal (SMD = 0.0039, p = 0.9877), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 50.3%, p = 0.1337). A small negative effect at 6 months was observed (SMD = -0.4234) and no significant effects at 3 months. There is no consistent or significant long-term impact on melasma severity. While some short-term improvements were observed, they often declined over time. Future studies are needed to better define the long-term effectiveness and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40167772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.