Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167644›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Artificial intelligence applications in endometriosis imaging.

Sneha Mittal, Angela Tong, Scott Young, Priyanka Jha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sneha MittalUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Angela TongNew York University, New York, USA.
Scott YoungMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Priyanka JhaStanford University, Stanford, USA. jhap@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) may have the potential to improve existing diagnostic challenges in endometriosis imaging. To better direct future research, this descriptive review summarizes the general landscape of AI applications in endometriosis imaging. Articles from PubMed were selected to represent different approaches to AI applications in endometriosis imaging. Current endometriosis imaging literature focuses on AI applications in ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Most studies use US data, with MRI studies being limited at present. The majority of US studies employ transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) data and aim to detect deep endometriosis implants, adenomyosis, endometriomas, and secondary signs of endometriosis. Most MRI studies evaluate endometriosis disease diagnosis and segmentation. Some studies analyze multi-modal methods for endometriosis imaging, combining US and MRI data or using imaging data in combination with clinical data. Current literature lacks generalizability and standardization. Most studies in this review utilize small sample sizes with retrospective approaches and single-center data. Existing models only focus on narrow disease detection or diagnosis questions and lack standardized ground truth. Overall, AI applications in endometriosis imaging analysis are in their early stages, and continued research is essential to develop and enhance these models.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndometriosisImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansUltrasonographyAdenomyosisArtificial intelligenceDeep learningEndometriosisImagingMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.