ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Relating cortical morphology, corticospinal excitability, corticomotor representation, and quadriceps strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in high-level athletes.Annals of joint · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current study investigated the relationship between sensorimotor cortical thickness, corticospinal excitability, corticomotor topography, and quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Ten women with a history of unilateral ACLR and 10 controls (CON) received single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation during unilateral, submaximal isometric knee extensions. Pulses were delivered to each vastus medialis oblique (VMO) hotspot with concurrent biceps femoris (BF) monitoring. Corticospinal excitability was assessed by delivering 40 pulses at various intensities to each hotspot. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were averaged at each intensity and fitted to a Boltzmann sigmoidal curve using nonlinear regression to derive v50, slope, and MEP
Indexed as
Identifiers
40167640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.