ArticleActa diabetologica2025
Machine learning-based models to predict type 2 diabetes combined with coronary heart disease and feature analysis-based on interpretable SHAP.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Development and validation of a deep neural network for predicting coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Diabetes Prediction: Integrating SMOTE Balancing with SHAP Explainability for Clinical Decision Support.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Extreme gradient boosting using conventional parameters accurately predicts insulin sensitivity in young and middle-aged Japanese persons.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning model of coronary artery disease combined with diabetes: development and validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease exhibit heightened prevalence in the Chinese population, posing as leading causes of mortality. The combination of diabetes and coronary heart disease, due to its challenging diagnosis and poor prognosis, imposes a significant disease burden. In recent years, machine learning has frequently been employed in diagnostic applications within medical fields; however, predictive models for type 2 diabetes complicated by coronary heart disease have been confronted with issues such as lower predictive performance and interference from other comorbidities during prediction.
methodsThis study enhances the predictive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC of models forecasting the coexistence of diabetes and coronary heart disease. We developed an advanced prediction model using XGBoost combined with SHAP for feature analysis. Through comparative feature selection, hyperparameter optimization, and computational efficiency analysis, we identified optimal conditions for model performance. External validation with independent datasets confirmed the model's robustness and generalizability, supporting its potential implementation in clinical practice.
resultsThis study compared three models-Random Forest, LightGBM, and XGBoost-and found that XGBoost exhibited superior performance in both efficacy and computational efficiency. The accuracy (Acc) of the XGBoost model was 0.8910, which improved to 0.8942 after hyperparameter tuning. External validation using datasets from Pingyang Hospital and Heji Hospital in Shanxi Province, China, yielded an AUC of 0.7897, demonstrating robust generalizability. By integrating SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for interpretability, our study identified bilirubin levels, basophil count, cholesterol levels, and age as key features for predicting the coexistence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary heart disease (CHD). These findings are seamlessly consistent with the feature importance rankings determined by the XGBoost algorithm. The model demonstrates moderate predictive performance (AUC = 0.7879 in external validation) with practical interpretability, offering potential utility in improving diagnostic efficiency for T2DM-CHD comorbidity in resource-limited settings. However, its clinical implementation requires further validation in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40167635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.