Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167619›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2025

A comparison of breast cancer incidence and cancer stages before and after the introduction of the Austrian national breast cancer screening program in the federal state of Salzburg : Real-world data from the Tumor Registry Salzburg.

Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Marc Vaisband, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Lukas Weiss, Bernhard Jaud, Martin Sprenger, Richard Greil

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon Peter GampenriederDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3966-1071
Marc VaisbandDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Gabriel RinnerthalerDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Lukas WeissDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Bernhard JaudDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Martin SprengerInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Richard GreilDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. r.greil@salk.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn January 2014 a national, quality-assured breast cancer screening program was introduced in Austria. To investigate if the program reduced the incidence of advanced breast cancer stages, we evaluated data from the Tumor Registry Salzburg, which records all cancer cases diagnosed in the federal state of Salzburg, Austria. Secondary objectives were changes in nodal status and the influence of age and urban or rural residence on stage distribution.

methodsFemale patients resident in the federal state of Salzburg with a first diagnosis of breast cancer in 2010-2022 were included. For the main objectives, patients aged 45-69 years with known tumor stages were evaluated. Age-standardized incidence rates were compared between 2010-2013 and 2016-2019 by normal approximation of Poisson rates and stage distributions by ordinal logistic regression.

resultsThe distribution of stages 0-IV did not differ significantly between 2010-2013 and 2016-2019 (P = 0.380). The percentage of stage IV breast cancer decreased numerically from 9.4-4.5% (P = 0.141). No statistically significant differences between early stages (0-I), advanced stages (II-IV, P = 0. 524) and between lymph node negative and positive cases (P = 0.538) were detected. Neither age nor urban/rural residence had a substantial influence on tumor stage. Interestingly, the breast cancer incidence rates in Salzburg decreased nonsignificantly after the introduction of screening: annual 245.7 vs. 229.8 cases per 100,000 standard population (P = 0.483).

conclusionOur findings do not support the assumption that the introduction of the Austrian breast cancer screening program significantly reduced advanced stage breast cancer in the federal state of Salzburg compared to the opportunistic screening established before.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerRegistriesAgedAustriaFemaleHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingDiagnosis rateMortalityOverdiagnosisScreening effectivenessTumor stage

Identifiers

PMID40167619
PMCPMC12006215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.