ReviewSkeletal radiology2025
Multifaceted imaging strategies for clinical trials of knee osteoarthritis-a tightly interlinked value and precision chain.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of radiography and MRI as screening tools and outcome measures in clinical trials of knee osteoarthritis: a perspective on the current status and outlook.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- Machine learning models for clinical and structural knee osteoarthritis prediction: Recent advancements and future directions.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoarthritis is a debilitating, whole-organ disease that involves all osteoarticular tissues. No effective treatments have yet been approved by the regulatory agencies for modifying the natural history of this disease and its structural progression. In this whitepaper, we will summarize concepts of "multi-faceted" (multi-contrast) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with a focus on its application in osteoarthritis clinical trials. The process described here encompasses a tightly interlinked value and precision chain, where all elements must be aligned seamlessly for the trial to succeed. The procedure should begin with careful patient characterization and selection, potentially aided by (multifaceted) imaging, so that the disease (sub-) types in these potential participant will match the mechanism of action (MOA) of the medical investigational product (i.e., the drug studied). This should be followed by a comprehensive yet efficient MRI acquisition protocol, employing sequences with various contrasts that permit the characterization of imaging-based joint pathologies and evaluation of the drug's MOA. Suitable image analysis tools must be employed, ideally adhering to regulatory compliance standards. Multiple validated endpoints can be derived from the various (multifaceted) contrasts, to be potentially combined to multi-component or composite endpoints, based on stringent a-priori rules. In conclusion, a robust value and precision chain needs to be fully functional for a disease-modifying osteoarthritis trial to be successful. Participant selection must be mindful of the drug's MOA, and a well-aligned and custom-tailored "multifaceted" image acquisition protocol, suitable image analysis tools, and meaningful endpoints should be in place, which should match the specific image contrasts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.