ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Optimal-Reference Excited State Methods: Static Correlation at Polynomial Cost with Single-Reference Coupled-Cluster Approaches.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Dose Makes the Poison: Perturbative Steps toward the Ultimate Linearized Coupled Cluster Method.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Diagrammatic Simplification of Linearized Coupled Cluster Theory.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Article
- Expectation Value-pCCD-Based Methods for Single-Electron Properties.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate yet efficient modeling of chemical systems with pronounced static correlation in their excited states remains a significant challenge in quantum chemistry, as most electronic structure methods that can adequately capture static correlation scale factorially with system size. Researchers are often left with no option but to use more affordable methods that may lack the accuracy required to model critical processes in photochemistry such as photolysis, photocatalysis, and nonadiabatic relaxation. A great deal of work has been dedicated to refining single-reference descriptions of static correlation in the ground state via "addition-by-subtraction" coupled cluster methods such as pair coupled cluster with double substitutions (pCCD), singlet-paired CCD (CCD0), triplet-paired CCD (CCD1), and CCD with frozen singlet- or triplet-paired amplitudes (CCDf0/CCDf1). By combining wave functions derived from these methods with the intermediate state representation (ISR), we gain insights into the extensibility of single-reference coupled cluster theory's coverage of static correlation to the excited state problem. Our CCDf1-ISR(2) approach is robust in the face of static correlation and provides enough dynamical correlation to accurately predict excitation energies to within about 0.2 eV in small organic molecules. We also highlight distinct advantages of the Hermitian ISR construction, such as the avoidance of pathological failures of equation-of-motion methods for excited state potential energy surface topology. Our results prompt us to continue exploring optimal single-reference theories (excited state approaches that leverage dependence on the initial reference wave function) as a potentially economical approach to the excited state static correlation problem.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.