ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Building a new score system for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of typical CLL/SLL, atypical CLL/SLL, and MCL based on the flow cytometry immunophenotyping.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Extracellular Vesicle Biomarkers in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Preliminary Study on Their Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Relevance.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Case Report: Simultaneous chronic lymphocytic leukemia and macrofocal multiple myeloma with extramedullary plasmacytoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of typical lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)/Small lymphocytic lymphoma(SLL) especially atypical CLL/SLL (aCLL/SLL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains highly challenging. Thus, we evaluated the accuracy of the combination of the Moreau score system (MSS) indicators (markers), with three new indicators CD19/CD20 ratio, CD200, and CD43 in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of typical CLL/SLL, atypical CLL/SLL, and MCL. We retrospectively retrieved data from peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph nodes of 120 patients comprising 64 typical CLL, 10 atypical CLL, and 46 MCL from March 2020 to September 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Multiparametric evaluation flow cytometry and immunophenotype were obtained via a B-cell panel and pathological reports were carried out. We observe that the new score system (NSS) and the MSS had the same specificity. However, the NSS demonstrated to have superior sensitivity compared to MSS. Adding three new markers CD19/CD20, CD200, and CD43 is accountable for the superior sensitivity in our NSS. Also, a combination of markers such as CD19, CD20, CD5, CD23, CD79b, FMC7, SmIg, CD22, CD43, CD200, the ratio CD19/CD20 may be a potential differentiating modality for typical CLL/SLL, atypical CLL/SLL, and MCL. Adding the CD19/CD20 ratio, CD43, and CD200 indicators to the MSS indicators could be potentially accurate diagnostic and differential diagnosis modality for typical CLL/SLL, atypical CLL/SLL, and MCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.