ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Assessment of Perioperative Transfusion Risk for Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Preoperative Diagnostic Testing in Patients Undergoing Uterovaginal Prolapse Repair: A Systematic Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisRoutine preoperative laboratory testing is commonly required prior to minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), despite limited evidence for its clinical value. We aim to identify transfusion risk for MIH for POP compared with other benign indications.
methodsUsing the 2014 to 2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Gynecology Participant Use Data File, we performed a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of perioperative blood transfusion following MIH for benign indications. MIH were identified using CPT codes, and surgical indications were classified according to ICD-9 and -10 codes. Gynecological malignancy risk-reducing indications were categorized as prophylactic. Hysterectomy routes included total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and vaginal hysterectomy. Hysterectomies for malignancy were excluded. Perioperative transfusions were defined as those given intraoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively.
resultsA total of 282,124 patients underwent MIH for benign gynecological indications. Patients undergoing MIH for POP compared with other benign indications were older, had lower BMI, and were less likely to currently smoke (p < 0.001). Overall transfusion rate for benign MIH was 1.2%, and transfusion rates differed significantly by surgical indication (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing MIH for POP had a low rate of transfusion (0.7%) compared with other benign indications such as anemia (15.9%), fibroids (1.8%), and menstrual disorders (1.5%).
conclusionsPatients undergoing surgery for POP had significantly lower rates of transfusion than those with other benign indications. Aggressive preoperative precautions, including laboratory testing and redundant intravenous access, are likely excessive in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40167601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.