Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167496›Full record

ArticleChild development

Developing Conflict Monitoring Abilities Predict Children's Revision of an Intuitive Theory.

Elfriede R Holstein, Maria Theobald, Leonie S Weindorf, Garvin Brod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elfriede R HolsteinDIPF|Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7488-6911
Maria TheobaldIDeA-Center for Research on Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0766-1680
Leonie S WeindorfDIPF|Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-9863
Garvin BrodDIPF|Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7976-5609

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BR 5736/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the role of children's conflict monitoring skills in revising an intuitive scientific theory. Children aged 5 to 9 (N = 177; 53% girls, data collected in Germany from 2019-2023) completed computer-based tasks on water displacement, a concept prone to misconceptions. Children predicted which of two objects would displace more water before receiving feedback. With increasing age, children showed slower response times for incorrect predictions (β = -0.04) and greater pupil dilation to unexpected outcomes (β = -0.04), indicating better conflict monitoring. Better conflict monitoring, in turn, predicted faster belief revision (β = 0.07). These findings suggest that conflict monitoring is crucial for learning in discovery-based activities.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentConflict, PsychologicalExecutive FunctionIntuitionThinkingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGermanyHumansMaleconflict monitoringgenerating predictionshypothesis testingmetacognitionviolation of expectation

Identifiers

PMID40167496
PMCPMC12023835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.